🔗 Share this article

Families whose relatives laid to rest in graves at risk from coastal erosion state that indecision over how to tackle the problem is creating unnecessary distress about the final resting places of their departed family.

An Impending Danger to Historic Graveyards

Local authorities have identified three church graveyards in the communities of Happisburgh, Mundesley, and Trimingham as being at risk of being engulfed by the sea in the coming decades.

A newly published study on the issue details a series of options, from doing nothing to disinterring bodies and reburying them in more secure locations. Officials maintain it is for the community to determine how to move forward.

“At the moment we’re in limbo. It upsets me. They intended this to be their final resting place, but it isn’t going to be because of the sea.”

Estimates indicate at least part of one churchyard could be claimed by the waves in the next 80 years, but some locals worry it will happen far earlier. “I think it’s got less than 20 years, if you look at what’s occurred in the last 30 years,” one said.

Haunted by the Past

One resident recalled a school trip to the nearby settlement of Eccles, which has largely vanished into the sea, including its church and graveyard.

“It was possible to see people’s bones,” she said. “Some have this romantic idea that the deceased will just get carried away to sea. That is not the case. People will collect remains as souvenirs and go grave robbing in search of treasures. It’s completely undignified.”

“I’m worried that the same thing that happened at Eccles will happen here and there’ll be bones on the beach. I would feel disgusted by that.”

A Paratrooper's Grave in Peril

Along the coast lies the burial plot of a former paratrooper who died while serving overseas. His parent said she lost sleep after learning her son’s grave might one day be relocated.

“It truly disturb me to consider this won’t be his lasting resting place,” she said. “For us it’s an significant site to visit.”

In her view, new burials should cease but says it is premature to exhume existing graves. “My preference for now is to take no action and watch carefully, but an timely resolution needs to be made when a critical moment has been reached.”

Seeking Solutions and Clarity

An absence of consensus over when and how to handle the problem has resulted in grieving relatives feeling exasperated and anxious.

Several families want more sea defences to delay the inevitable erosion and to permit funerals to continue for now. Others argue the time for moving graves is drawing near.

“The situation is very emotional,” said one relative. “The council’s report was really good, but now there’s uncertainty about how it is taken forward. And all parties is washing their hands over who is responsible.”

A local official said the graveyards were owned and managed of the church authorities. “In the end it is up to them to choose the direction to take. We are here to help support them through that process with residents.”

He added there was time to consider all the options. “This concerns decades before it starts to be lost.”

“Currently, there exists no common view on what should happen yet. It requires productive community discussions to discover the right answers for each village.”

The possibility of the loss of the historic sites was described as one of “immense sadness for the local community,” but church representatives also spoke of a belief in resurrection, providing a spiritual viewpoint on the temporal loss of hallowed earth.